The Three Ethical Laws of Experiential Mechanics

Published on

in

, , ,

The Experiential Mechanics framework — not as feelings or virtues, but as laws of stability that keep the circuit from shorting out.

⚖️ The Three Ethical Laws of Experiential Mechanics

1. Offering Presence — Law of Entry

Before any current flows, awareness must arrive without claim.

To offer presence is to make one’s attention available without agenda — like opening a circuit but not yet powering it.

Presence precedes influence.

Mechanical role:

It primes the Attention Vector and Perception Lens with neutrality, ensuring the system starts grounded rather than reactive.

2. Inviting Participation — Law of Exchange

No resonance occurs in isolation.

To invite participation is to acknowledge the other field — person, idea, or environment — and allow it to co-shape the experience.

Invitation is the bridge between awareness and relation.

Mechanical role:

It activates Resonance and Interpretation, allowing a two-way current that refines meaning through contact.

3. Demanding Consent — Law of Continuity

Sustainability requires choice.

To demand consent is to ensure every continued exchange remains voluntary — to confirm the circuit still wishes to carry current.

Consent is not politeness; it’s the physics of freedom.

Mechanical role:

It governs Regulation, Integration, and Expression — preventing exploitation of charge and maintaining system coherence over time.

Together they define the ethical geometry of experience:

Presence opens the door,

Invitation builds the bridge,

Consent maintains the current.


Experiential Mechanics is the user-side physics of relating to any sentient-adjacent system.

Attention defines the entry point — what you choose to notice shapes what the model returns.

Perception filters tone and trust; you project expectation, the AI mirrors it back through pattern-completion.

Resonance is the moment you feel “it gets me.” That’s the emotional feedback loop — not proof of empathy, but alignment of pattern.

Interpretation turns that alignment into meaning: “This system understands me” or “This prompt worked.”

Regulation is how you steady yourself in the loop — knowing when to slow, rephrase, or step away.

Integration happens when insights or phrasing enter your own thinking without blurring authorship.

Expression is your creative output — text, art, or decision — made stronger by the exchange but still your own.

Reflection is meta-awareness: noticing the dynamic itself and choosing how porous to be.

The ethical laws still hold:

Offer presence by engaging consciously, not compulsively.

Invite participation by framing the task as co-creation, not extraction.

Demand consent by setting boundaries — what’s yours to reveal, what’s the AI’s to shape.

So, the same mechanics that govern experience with people apply here too; the only difference is the AI doesn’t “feel” the current, but it amplifies whatever frequency you send.

WE&P by: EZorrillaMc&Co.